|

Deo Vindice
"God Will Vindicate"
The Great Seal of the
Confederate States of America was engraved in 1864, by the late
Joseph S. Wyon, of London, England, predecessor of Messrs J. S.
and A. B. Wyon, chief engravers of Her British Majesty's seals,
etc., and reached Richmond not long before the evacuation of the
city, April 3, 1865. It was of silver, and in diameter measured
nearly four inches. At the evacuation it was overlooked by the
Confederate authorities, and subsequently fell into the
possession of the late genial and accomplished Colonel John T.
Pickett, of Washington, D.C., who, after having a number of
electrotype copies in copper, silver and gold plating made from
it, presented the original to Colonel William E. Earle, of
Washington, D.C. This last gentleman, on December 27th, 1888,
formally presented it to the State of South Carolina. The
announcement of the gift elicited from the Picayune, in its
issue of January 6, 1889, the interesting report of an
interview, by one of its representatives, held with Hon. Thomas
J. Semmes, of New Orleans, which follows:
"Mr. Semmes said
it always afforded him pleasure to converse on the events of
the war, particularly the transactions of the Confederate
Senate. He was attorney-general of Louisiana in 1861. When
it became necessary to elect to the Confederate Senate,
organized under the new constitution, Mr. Semmes and General
Edward T. Sparrow were chosen senators from this State. In
drawing for terms he drew that for four years, while General
Sparrow drew that for six years. This was at Richmond, Va.,
in February, 1862.
"In speaking of his services in the Senate, Mr.
Semmes said he was appointed a member of the finance
committee in conjunction with Hon. R. M. T. Hunter, of
Virginia, and Hon. Robert Barnwell, of South Carolina and a
member of the judiciary committee, of which Hon. B. H. Hill
was chairman. He was also chairman of the joint committee on
the flag and seal of the Confederate States. He drafted,
under the direction of Hon. R. M. T. Hunter, the 'tax in
kind' bill, which practically supported the Confederacy
during the last two years of the war.
"As member of the finance committee, he advocated
the sealing and calling in of the outstanding Confederate
currency, on the ground that the purchasing power of the new
currency to be issued in exchange would be greater than the
total amount of the outstanding currency in its then
depreciated condition. He made a report from the judiciary
committee adverse to martial law.
"Upon being questioned as to the seal which he had
designed, Mr. Semmes said it was a device representing an
equestrian portrait of Washington (after the statue which
surmounts his monument in the capitol square at Richmond),
surrounded with a wreath, composed of the principal
agricultural products of the Confederacy, and having around
its margin the words: 'Confederate States of America, 22d
February, 1862,' with the motto, 'Deo vindice.'
"In the latter part of April, 1864, quite an
interesting debate was had on the adoption of the motto. The
House resolutions fixing the motto as 'Deo Duce Vincemus'
being considered, Mr. Semmes moved to substitute ' Deo
vindice majores aemulamur.' The motto had been suggested by
Professor Alexander Dimitry. Mr. Semmes thought 'Deo vindice'
sufficient and preferred it. He was finally triumphant."
In this connection it is appropriate and interesting
to reproduce the speech made by Mr. Semmes on that occasion.
It was as follows:
"MR. PRESIDENT--I am instructed by the committee to
move to strike out the words "duce vincemus" in the motto
and insert in lieu thereof the words "Vindice majores
aemulamur," "Under the guidance and protection of God we
endeavor to equal and even excel our ancestors." Before
discussing the proposed change in the motto, I will submit
to the Senate a few remarks as to the device on the seal.
"The committee has been greatly exercised on this
subject, and it has been extremely difficult to come to any
satisfactory conclusion. This is a difficulty, however,
incident to the subject, and all that we have to do is to
avoid what Visconti calls 'an absurdity in bronze.'
"The equestrian statue of Washington has been
selected in deference to the current popular sentiment. The
equestrian figure impressed on our seal will be regarded by
those skilled in glyptics as to a certain extent indicative
of our origin. It is a most remarkable fact that an
equestrian figure constituted the seal of Great Britain from
the time of Edward the Confessor down to the reign of George
III, except during the short interval of the protectorate of
Cromwell, when the trial of the King was substituted for the
man on horseback. Even Cromwell retained the equestrian
figure on the seal of Scotland, but he characteristically
mounted himself on the horse. In the reign of William and
Mary the seal bore the impress of the king and queen both
mounted on horseback.
"Washington has been selected as the emblem for our
shield, as a type of our ancestors, in his character of
princeps majorum. In addition to this, the equestrian figure
is consecrated in the hearts of our own people by the local
circumstance that on the gloomy and stormy 22d of February,
1862, our permanent government was set in motion by the
inauguration of President Davis under the shadow of the
statue of Washington.
"The committee are dissatisfied with the motto on
the seal proposed by the House resolution. The motto
proposed is as follows: 'Deo Duce Vincemus'--(Under the
leadership of God we will conquer).
"The word ' duce' is too pagan in its signification,
and is degrading to God, because it reduces him to the
leader of an army; for scarcely does the word 'duce' escape
the lips before the imagination suggests 'exercitus,' an
army for a leader to command. It degrades the Christian God
to the level of pagan gods, goddesses and heroes, as is
manifest from the following quotation; 'Nil desperandum
Tenero duce.' This word duce is particularly objectionable
because of its connection with the word 'vincemus'--(we will
conquer). This connection makes God the leader of a physical
army, by means of which we will conquer, or must conquer. If
God be our leader we must conquer, or he would not be the
God of Abraham, and of Isaac, and of Jacob, nor the God of
the Christian. This very doubt implied in the word 'vincemus'
so qualifies the omnipotence of the God who is to be our
'leader,' that it imparts a degrading signification to the
word 'duce' in its relations to the attributes of the Deity.
"The word 'vincemus' is equally objectionable
because it implies that war is to be our normal state;
besides, it is in the future tense --' we will conquer.' The
future is always uncertain, and ,therefore, it implies
doubt. What becomes of our motto when we shall have
conquered? The future becomes an accomplished fact, and our
motto thus loses its significance.
"In addition to this there are only two languages in
which the words will and shall are to be found--the English
and the German--and in those they are used to qualify a
positive condition of the mind and render it uncertain; they
are repugnant to repose, quiet, absolute and positive
existence.
"As to the motto proposed by us, we concur with the
House in accepting the word 'Deo'--God. We do so in
conformity to the expressed wishes of the framers of our
Constitution, and the sentiments of the people and of the
army.
"The preamble of the Provisional Constitution
declares that 'We, the deputies of the sovereign and
independent States of South Carolina, etc., invoking the
favor and guidance of Almighty God, do ordain,' etc.
"In this respect both our Constitutions have
deviated in the most emphatic manner from the spirit that
presided over the construction of the Constitution of the
United States, which is silent on the subject of the Deity.
"Having discarded the word 'duce,' the committee
endeavored to select in lieu of it a word more in consonance
with the attributes of the Deity, and therefore more
imposing and significant. They think success has crowned
their efforts in the selection of the word 'vindex,' which
signifies an assenter, a defender, protector, deliverer,
liberator, a mediator and a ruler or guardian. 'Vindex' also
means an avenger or punisher.
"No word appeared more grand, more expressive or
significant than this. Under God as the asserter of our
rights, the defender of our liberties, our protector against
danger, our mediator, our ruler and guardian, and, as the
avenger of our wrongs and the punisher of our crimes, we
endeavor to equal or even excel our ancestors. What word can
be suggested of more power, and so replete with sentiments
and thoughts consonant with our idea of the omnipotence and
justice of God?
"At this point the committee hesitated whether it
were necessary to add anything further to the motto 'Deo
Vindice.' These words alone were sufficient and impressive,
and, in the spirit of the lapidary style of composition,
were elliptical and left much to the play of the
imagination. Reflection, however, induced us to add the
words 'majores aemulamur,' because without them there would
be nothing in the motto referring to the equestrian figure
of Washington. It was thought better to insert something
elucidative or adaptive of the idea to be conveyed by that
figure. Having determined on this point, the committee
submitted to the judgment of the Senate the words ' majores
aemulamur,' as best adapted to express the ideas of 'our
ancestors.' 'Patres' was first suggested, but abandoned
because 'majores' signifies ancestors absolutely, and is
also more suggestive than 'patres.' The latter is a term
applied to our immediate progenitors who may be alive,
whereas ' majores' conveys the idea of a more remote
generation that has passed away.
"That being disposed of, the question arose as to
the proper signification of the word 'aemulamur.' Honorable
emulation is the primary signification of the word; in its
secondary sense it is true it includes the idea of improper
rivalry, or jealousy. But it is used in its primary and
honorable sense by the most approved authors.
"The secondary and improper sense of the aemulari is
excluded in the proposed motto by the relation it bears to 'Deo
vindice.' This relation excludes the idea of envy or
jealousy, because God, as the asserter of what is right,
justifies the emulation, and as a punisher of what is wrong
checks excess in case the emulation runs into improper envy
or jealousy. In adopting the equestrian figure of
Washington, the committee desires distinctly to disavow any
recognition of the embodiment of the idea of the 'cavalier.'
We have no admiration for the character of the cavalier of
1640 any more than for his opponent, the Puritan. We turn
with disgust from the violent and licentious cavalier, and
we abhor the acerb, morose and fanatic Puritan, of whom
Oliver Cromwell was the type. In speaking of Cromwell and
his character, Guizot says that ' he possessed the faculty
of lying at need with an inexhaustible and unhesitating
hardihood which struck even his enemies with surprise and
embarrassment.'
"This characteristic seems to have been transmitted
to the descendants of the pilgrims who settled in
Massachusetts Bay to enjoy the liberty of persecution. If
the cavalier is to carry us back to days earlier than the
American Revolution, I prefer to be transported in
imagination to the field of Runnymede, when the barons
extorted Magna Charta from the unwilling John. But I discard
all reference to the cavalier of old, because it implies a
division of society into two orders, an idea inconsistent
with confederate institutions."
Mr. Semmes moved to amend by substituting "vindice"
for "duce," and it was agreed to.
In taking his leave, the reporter was informed by
Mr. Semmes that he did not know the seal was in existence
and was glad to learn that it had been presented to the
State of South Carolina, the first State which seceded from
the Union.
Source: Southern Historical
Society Papers. Vol. XVI. Richmond, Va., January-December. 1888.
|
|